Comparison of digital pcr and quantitative pcr with various sars-cov-2 primer-probe sets

43Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an international health emergency. Current diagnostic tests are based on the reverse transcriptionquantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) method, which is the gold standard test that involves the amplification of viral RNA. However, the RT-qPCR assay has limitations in terms of sensitivity and quantification. In this study, we tested both qPCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to detect low amounts of viral RNA. The cycle threshold (CT) of the viral RNA by RT-PCR significantly varied according to the sequences of the primer and probe sets with in vitro transcript (IVT) RNA or viral RNA as templates, whereas the copy number of the viral RNA by ddPCR was effectively quantified with IVT RNA, cultured viral RNA, and RNA from clinical samples. Furthermore, the clinical samples were assayed via both methods, and the sensitivity of the ddPCR was determined to be equal to or more than that of the RT-qPCR. However, the ddPCR assay is more suitable for determining the copy number of reference materials. These findings suggest that the qPCR assay with the ddPCR defined reference materials could be used as a highly sensitive and compatible diagnostic method for viral RNA detection.

References Powered by Scopus

20139Citations
23475Readers

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Nucleic acid testing of sars‐cov‐2

55Citations
117Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, C., Lee, J., ul Hassan, Z., Ku, K. B., Kim, S. J., Kim, H. G., … Kim, S. (2021). Comparison of digital pcr and quantitative pcr with various sars-cov-2 primer-probe sets. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 31(3), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.4014/JMB.2009.09006

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

52%

Researcher 10

40%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 12

55%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

23%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

14%

Engineering 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0