Missile defence

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Though the US has cancelled the Eastern European ‘Third Site’ missile defence programme, it has done so in favour of a staged improvement of sea-based defences. This represents a sizeable investment in missile defence. By contrast, European states, including the UK, have failed to invest. Britain must therefore, in the coming defence review, decide how to apply increasingly limited resources to the problems inherent to its reliance on American support. © 2009 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Codner, M. (2009). Missile defence. RUSI Journal, 154(5), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071840903411905

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free