Evaluation of alternative management strategies for maintenance of genetic variation in wildlife populations

18Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Wildlife management strategies are often designed around a population's demographic goals, but such strategies also can inadvertently impact genetic variation. For species like bison Bison bison, where management includes the regular removal of individuals to maintain restricted population sizes on constrained landscapes, management actions can be tailored to address genetic diversity retention in addition to simply maintaining a target population size. In this study, we provide an assessment of alternative culling strategies for maintenance of genetic variation in managed wildlife populations. Our primary goal was to compare the long-term retention of genetic variation and accumulation of inbreeding among three types of culling strategies, including one that considered genetic variation directly by measuring variation at a suite of variable loci [mean allele frequency (MAF) strategy], one that used genome-wide measures of variation [mean kinship (MK) strategy] and one that relied solely on demographic information (sex and age; RANDOM). To achieve this goal, we built an individual-based model, parameterized in accordance with bison biology, to project levels of genetic variation and inbreeding over time under each of the three management strategies. Our results suggest wildlife management strategies that incorporate goals for retaining genetic variation (MAF and MK strategies) are better suited to preserving the evolutionary potential of wildlife populations than those that focus solely on a target size and demographic stability (RANDOM). In particular, the MK culling strategy performed the best at maximizing the retention of genome-wide variation. These results extend previous work demonstrating the utility of pedigree-based mate selection strategies in captive population management, and show that such strategies maximize the retention of genome-wide variation under culling practices as well. These models will aid in the long-term management of bison, and can be adapted to other managed wildlife species.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giglio, R. M., Ivy, J. A., Jones, L. C., & Latch, E. K. (2016). Evaluation of alternative management strategies for maintenance of genetic variation in wildlife populations. Animal Conservation, 19(4), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12254

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free