Design of a Patient Voice App Experience for Heart Failure Management: Usability Study

5Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The use of digital therapeutics (DTx) in the prevention and management of medical conditions has increased through the years, with an estimated 44 million people using one as part of their treatment plan in 2021, nearly double the number from the previous year. DTx are commonly accessed through smartphone apps, but offering these treatments through additional platforms can improve the accessibility of these interventions. Voice apps are an emerging technology in the digital health field; not only do they have the potential to improve DTx adherence, but they can also create a better user experience for some user groups. Objective: This research aimed to identify the acceptability and feasibility of offering a voice app for a chronic disease self-management program. The objective of this project was to design, develop, and evaluate a voice app of an already-existing smartphone-based heart failure self-management program, Medly, to be used as a case study. Methods: A voice app version of Medly was designed and developed through a user-centered design process. We conducted a usability study and semistructured interviews with patients with heart failure (N=8) at the Peter Munk Cardiac Clinic in Toronto General Hospital to better understand the user experience. A Medly voice app prototype was built using a software development kit in tandem with a cloud computing platform and was verified and validated before the usability study. Data collection and analysis were guided by a mixed methods triangulation convergence design. Results: Common themes were identified in the results of the usability study, which involved 8 participants with heart failure. Almost all participants (7/8, 88%) were satisfied with the voice app and felt confident using it, although half of the participants (4/8, 50%) were unsure about using it in the future. Six main themes were identified: changes in physical behavior, preference between voice app and smartphone, importance of music during voice app interaction, lack of privacy concerns, desired reassurances during voice app interaction, and helpful aids during voice app interaction. These findings were triangulated with the quantitative data, and it concluded that the main area for improvement was related to the ease of use; design changes were then implemented to better improve the user experience. Conclusions: This work offered preliminary insight into the acceptability and feasibility of a Medly voice app. Given the recent emergence of voice apps in health care, we believe that this research offered invaluable insight into successfully deploying DTx for chronic disease self-management using this technology.

References Powered by Scopus

Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough?

834Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global epidemiology and future trends of heart failure

335Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of mobile health applications for health-promoting behavior among individuals with chronic medical conditions

82Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Voice App Design for Heart Failure Self-management: Proof-of-Concept Implementation Study

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From Command to Care: A Scoping Review on Utilization of Smart Speakers by Patients and Providers

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Co-Creation in the Development of Digital Therapeutics: A Narrative Review

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barbaric, A., Munteanu, C., Ross, H., & Cafazzo, J. A. (2022). Design of a Patient Voice App Experience for Heart Failure Management: Usability Study. JMIR Formative Research, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.2196/41628

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 5

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

40%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 5

38%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

23%

Computer Science 3

23%

Engineering 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free