Blameworthiness in strategic games

12Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There are multiple notions of coalitional responsibility. The focus of this paper is on the blameworthiness defined through the principle of alternative possibilities: a coalition is blamable for a statement if the statement is true, but the coalition had a strategy to prevent it. The main technical result is a sound and complete bimodal logical system that describes properties of blameworthiness in one-shot games.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naumov, P., & Tao, J. (2019). Blameworthiness in strategic games. In 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, 31st Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019 and the 9th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019 (pp. 3011–3018). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free