Understanding and managing business—development hybrids: an institutional logics case analysis

9Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There are growing numbers of business—development hybrids that combine a commercial orientation with an intent to deliver development goals. Yet, within development studies research to date, there has been limited conceptualization of these organizations. Borrowing from the extensive literature in other disciplines, this paper argues that the concept of institutional logics can be used as a basis for understanding business—development hybrids. The lens of institutional logics is used to analyze two hybrid case studies of ‘impact sourcing’ that outsource IT work to disadvantaged groups in Pakistan and India. Synergies between business and development logics were managed by combining those logics, but tensions between the two required techniques of compromising or decoupling the logics. Organizations also managed the logics by presenting a more business-oriented face to clients and a more development-oriented face to workers, by protecting their development logic from commercial pressures, and by seeking to institutionalize both logics. Implications are considered for practice and for future development research.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
Get full text
1209Citations
2184Readers

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heeks, R., Malik, F., Morgan, S., & Nicholson, B. (2020). Understanding and managing business—development hybrids: an institutional logics case analysis. Development Studies Research, 7(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2020.1777180

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

72%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Researcher 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 9

38%

Business, Management and Accounting 7

29%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6

25%

Computer Science 2

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 30

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0