When environmental and social policy converge: The case of Boston's Fairmount line

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In February of 2010, the federal Office of Sustainable Communities selected five pilot projects to serve as exemplars of the United States' new sustainable urban policy. One of the pilots, the expansion of the Fairmount commuter rail line in Boston, integrates social needs and environmental benefits within a coordinated strategy of community development. In this chapter, I detail the case of the Fairmount line in Boston. First, I discuss the process of collaboration between grassroots social policy and environmental policy advocates. Through an effective framing of the problems facing inner-city residents, disparate advocacy groups joined forces to advocate for a single policy outcome, seeing the transit expansion as simultaneously socially and environmentally beneficial. But the Fairmount case also involved a political evolution from above: Local and regional policymakers reimagined the initial social policy as an environmental policy, ultimately recognizing the interdependent social and environmental benefits of transit expansion. Sustainable policy development requires integrated partnerships, and I conclude with lessons for policymakers and practitioners alike.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levine, J. R. (2013). When environmental and social policy converge: The case of Boston’s Fairmount line. In Environmental Policy is Social Policy - Social Policy is Environmental Policy: Toward Sustainability Policy (pp. 153–163). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6723-6_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free