Risk score to predict 1-year mortality after haemodialysis initiation in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease under predialysis nephrology care

29Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Few risk scores are available for predicting mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing predialysis nephrology care. Here, we developed a risk score using predialysis nephrology practice data to predict 1-year mortality following the initiation of haemodialysis (HD) for CKD patients. Methods: This was a multicenter cohort study involving CKD patients who started HD between April 2006 and March 2011 at 21 institutions with nephrology care services. Patients who had not received predialysis nephrology care at an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of approximately 10 mL/min per 1.73 m2 were excluded. Twenty-nine candidate predictors were selected, and the final model for 1-year mortality was developed via multivariate logistic regression and was internally validated by a bootstrapping technique. Results: A total of 688 patients were enrolled, and 62 (9.0%) patients died within one year of HD initiation. The following variables were retained in the final model: eGFR, serum albumin, calcium, Charlson Comorbidity Index excluding diabetes and renal disease (modified CCI), performance status (PS), and usage of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). Their β-coefficients were transformed into integer scores: three points were assigned to modified CCI≥3 and PS 3-4; two to calcium>8.5 mg/dL, modified CCI 1-2, and no use of ESA; and one to albumin<3.5 g/dL, eGFR>7 mL/min per 1.73 m2, and PS 1-2. Predicted 1-year mortality risk was 2.5% (score 0-4), 5.5% (score 5-6), 15.2% (score 7-8), and 28.9% (score 9-12). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.89). Conclusions: We developed a simple 6-item risk score predicting 1-year mortality after the initiation of HD that might help nephrologists make a shared decision with patients and families regarding the initiation of HD.

Figures

  • Table 1. Candidate predictors and outcome variables.
  • Fig 1. Process of the multiple imputation and derivation of the prediction rule. (1) Five multiply imputed datasets were created using original data. (2) Backward elimination was separately applied to each of the five imputed datasets, resulting in five sets of selected predictors. (3) Predictors that were selected in all of the five data sets were chosen as the final set of selected predictors, with exclusion of some predictors based on balance between number of candidate predictors with number of outcomes (deaths) and discussion according to clinical relevance. (4) The logistic regression with the selected six predictors was separately applied to each of the five imputed data sets, giving five sets of β-coefficients of the six predictors. (5) To avoid overfitting, each of five sets of β-coefficients of the six predictors were shrunken using heuristic shrinkage factor. Then, the mean for each of the five estimates for β-coefficients of the final model were taken and variances of the five estimates were pooled according to Rubin’s rules. (6) The shrunken β-coefficients of the predictors in the final model divided by two-fifths of the two small β-coefficients in the model and rounded up to the nearest integer to give a simple point score.
  • Table 2. Retained predictors in each of 5 imputed dataset and choice of the predictors.
  • Table 3. Multivariable predictors of 1-year mortality and associated risk scoring system.
  • Fig 2. Agreement between the predicted mortality risks and the observed proportions. The shortdashed line (“Apparent”) indicates the agreement between predicted mortality risks and observed proportions of the original model. The sold line (“Bias-corrected”) indicates the agreement between predicted mortality risks and observed proportions of the bootstrap model.
  • Table 4. Score chart to predict 1-year mortality risk.
  • Fig 3. Predicted mortality risks and observed proportions for ranges of total scores. Prognostic score calculated form the following six items well predicts 1-year mortality for patients initiating haemodialysis: high eGFR level (>7 mL/min per 1.73 m2), low serum albumin levels, high calcium levels, high modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, low performance status, and no use of ESA. The modified Charlson Comorbidity Index was excluded items related to diabetes and renal disease from the original Charlson Comorbidity Index in the present study.
  • Table 5. Predictedmortality risks and observed proportions for ranges of total scores.

References Powered by Scopus

A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation

40924Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toxicology and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

9524Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multivariable prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors

8103Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Functional and cognitive impairment, frailty, and adverse health outcomes in older patients reaching ESRD-a systematic review

154Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biomarkers of cardiovascular disease and mortality risk in patients with advanced CKD

151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The relevance of geriatric impairments in patients starting dialysis: A systematic review

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doi, T., Yamamoto, S., Morinaga, T., Sada, K. E., Kurita, N., & Onishi, Y. (2015). Risk score to predict 1-year mortality after haemodialysis initiation in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease under predialysis nephrology care. PLoS ONE, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129180

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

53%

Researcher 6

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

65%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

19%

Psychology 3

10%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 32

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0