Illiberalism, revolution and the 2016 Macedonian elections: The effects of social movements on electoral accountability

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To what extent are social movements capable of steering voters’ choices in illiberal societies? Through the empirical exploration of Macedonia’s 2016 Colourful Revolution, this study examines the potential of Anti-Corruption Movements (ACMs) to inflict electoral punishment on illiberal leaders. It adopts a corruption-based conception of illiberalism, whereby ‘the misuse of public office for private gain’ in the shape of bribery, nepotism, clientelism, and misuse of public party funding presents itself as one of the foremost components of illiberal rule. Drawing from original survey data and a set of semistructured interviews with representatives of the Colourful Revolution and members of the Macedonian civil society, this paper sheds light upon the effects of ACMs on electoral behaviour and, ultimately, on the political potential of ACMs in the reversal of a country’s illiberal course. The study finds strong indicators pointing to the Colourful Revolution’s encouraging role in stoking increasingly negative perceptions towards Macedonia’s illiberal government ahead of the 2016 election, but primarily among voters that had not supported the main government party in the previous election

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Esteso-Pérez, A. (2021). Illiberalism, revolution and the 2016 Macedonian elections: The effects of social movements on electoral accountability. Intersections East European Journal of Society and Politics, 7(4), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.17356/IEEJSP.V7I4.828

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free