Culturally Responsive Personalized Learning: Recommendations for a Working Definition and Framework

3Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Culturally responsive personalized learning (CRPL) emphasizes the importance of aligning personalized learning approaches with previous research on culturally responsive practices to consider social, cultural, and linguistic contexts for learning. In the present discussion, we briefly summarize two bodies of literature considered in defining and developing a framework for CRPL: technology-enabled personalized learning and culturally relevant, responsive, and sustaining pedagogy. We then provide a definition and framework consisting of six key principles of CRPL, along with a brief discussion of theories and empirical evidence to support these principles. These six principles include agency, dynamic adaptation, connection to lived experiences, consideration of social movements, opportunities for collaboration, and shared power. These principles fall into three domains: fostering flexible student-centered learning experiences, leveraging relevant content and practices, and supporting meaningful interactions within a community. Finally, we conclude with some implications of this framework for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners working to ensure that all students receive high-quality learning opportunities that are both personalized and culturally responsive.

References Powered by Scopus

10425Citations
19019Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ober, T. M., Lehman, B. A., Gooch, R., Oluwalana, O., Solyst, J., Phelps, G., & Hamilton, L. S. (2023). Culturally Responsive Personalized Learning: Recommendations for a Working Definition and Framework. ETS Research Report Series, 2023(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12372

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

56%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

31%

Researcher 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 8

40%

Social Sciences 6

30%

Mathematics 3

15%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0