The predictive value of certain mammographic signs in screening for breast cancer

112Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Prospective evaluation of aggressive screening for breast cancer which are either 5 mm in size or alternatively, wholly intraductal or in situ lobular, was performed. Twenty‐one percent of all cancers were identified by the presence of microcalcifications; 71% of these were minimal and the predictive value of microcalcifications was 11.5% (±1.7). The probability of cancer given a radiographically benign, dominant mass over 1 cm in size, palpable or not, was 2% (≥0.8) and two‐thirds of these cancer were minimal. If diagnosis had not been established by biopsy for these benign appearing lesions six percent of all cancer would not have been detected. Had clinical examination been omitted from screening, 32 cancers (16%) would have been eliminated, 13 of which were minimal. However, the false‐positive rate would have been halved. The range of predictive values, true‐positive rates, and percent of minimal cancers detected are presented for each of several mammographis sign when clinical examination was either positive or negative. Copyright © 1983 American Cancer Society

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions

1547Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Breast cancer and atypia among young and middle-aged women: A study of 110 medicolegal autopsies

367Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preoperative staging of large primary breast cancer with [ <sup>18</sup>F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional imaging procedures

269Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moskowitz, M. (1983). The predictive value of certain mammographic signs in screening for breast cancer. Cancer, 51(6), 1007–1011. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19830315)51:6<1007::AID-CNCR2820510607>3.0.CO;2-P

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

75%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

50%

Computer Science 2

50%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free