Prognostic value of CEA and CA19-9 in patients with local advanced rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, radical surgery and postoperative chemotherapy

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: We aim to investigate the prognostic factors and evaluate the role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in local advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT), radical surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. Methods: In total, 197 cases of LARC patients who underwent neo-CRT, total mesorectal excision (TME), and adjuvant chemotherapy were recruited. Serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 were detected both at baseline and after neo-chemoradiotherapy. Multivariate analysis was used to assess correlations between levels of CEA and CA19-9 and patients' prognosis (survival, recurrence, and metastasis). Rates of survival, distant metastasis (DM), and local recurrence (LR) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards. Results: The median follow-up time was 45.3 months, and a cohort of 197 patients was analyzed; 84 (42.6%) patients had elevated baseline CEA levels, 21 (10.7%) patients had elevated baseline CA19-9 levels, and 14 (7.1%) patients had both; 77.4% (65/84) patients with high CEA levels and 76.2% (16/21) with high CA19-9 levels returned to normal after neo-chemoradiotherapy. The Cox regression model suggested that elevated CEA was associated with an increased risk of disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 2.058, 95% CI: 1.034-4.096, P=0.040) and DM (HR: 2.144, 95% CI: 1.058-4.346, P=0.034). Elevated CA19-9 was identified as an independent prognostic factor, with poorer overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.894, 95% CI: 1.196-7.006, P=0.018) and DFS (HR: 4.533, 95% CI: 2.067-9.940, P<0.001) and increased incidences of LR (HR: 6.139, 95% CI: 1.813-20.783, P=0.004) and DM (HR: 4.052, 95% CI: 1.892-8.678, P<0.001). Besides, combined CEA with CA19-9 was a stronger prognostic predictor. Patients with both high levels of CEA and CA19-9 had the poorest DFS (HR: 8.157, 95% CI: 3.232-20.591, P<0.001) and the highest risk of DM (HR: 8.790, 95% CI: 3.324-23.248, P<0.001). Conclusions: LARC patients with high levels of CEA or/and CA19-9 at initial treatment have a worse prognosis, even after neo-CRT, subsequent radical resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy. These findings suggest that this subset of patients requires more intensive treatment or additional treatment strategies.

References Powered by Scopus

Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

5273Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation

3864Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer

2413Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Preoperative prediction of rectal Cancer staging combining MRI deep transfer learning, radiomics features, and clinical factors: accurate differentiation from stage T2 to T3

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and validation of nomograms based on pre-/post-operative CEA and CA19-9 for survival predicting in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients after radical resection

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Machine learning algorithms to predict atypical metastasis of colorectal cancer patients after surgical resection

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shan, J., Gu, B., Shi, L., Wang, X., Ye, W., Zhou, W., & Sun, X. (2021). Prognostic value of CEA and CA19-9 in patients with local advanced rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, radical surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. Translational Cancer Research, 10(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2269

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

33%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

33%

Arts and Humanities 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free