Background: In primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are often given in order to attain and maintain better myocardial perfusion. We tested the hypothesis that intracoronary (IC) bolus of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors might produce a greater improvement in left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function than an intravenous (IV) bolus. Methods and results: Seventy seven patients undergoing primary PCI for their first STelevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were randomly assigned to either an IC or IV bolus of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, followed by IV infusion. Compared with the echocardiographic findings within 3 days after PCI, LV ejection fraction was higher at 1 year, with no significant differences between the IV and IC groups (IV: 44% vs. 49%, p = 0.001; IC: 43% vs. 48%, p<0.001). LV diastolic function (E/E') did not significantly change at 1 year by either approach. Conclusions: LV systolic function improved by a similar magnitude following primary PCI, with either IC or IV bolus administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy. However, no significant changes were observed in LV diastolic function. © 2013 Via Medica.
CITATION STYLE
Pellicori, P., Torromeo, C., Barillà, F., Mangieri, E., Evangelista, A., Truscelli, G., … Wong, K. (2013). Intravenous versus intracoronary bolus of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term left ventricular systolic and diastolic function. Cardiology Journal, 20(3), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.2013.0077
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.