A machine learning approach to galaxy properties: Joint redshift-stellar mass probability distributions with Random Forest

33Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We demonstrate that highly accurate joint redshift-stellar mass probability distribution functions (PDFs) can be obtained using the Random Forest (RF) machine learning (ML) algorithm, even with few photometric bands available. As an example, we use the Dark Energy Survey (DES), combined with the COSMOS2015 catalogue for redshifts and stellar masses. We build two ML models: one containing deep photometry in the griz bands, and the second reflecting the photometric scatter present in the main DES survey, with carefully constructed representative training data in each case. We validate our joint PDFs for 10 699 test galaxies by utilizing the copula probability integral transform and the Kendall distribution function, and their univariate counterparts to validate the marginals. Benchmarked against a basic set-up of the template-fitting code bagpipes, our ML-based method outperforms template fitting on all of our predefined performance metrics. In addition to accuracy, the RF is extremely fast, able to compute joint PDFs for a million galaxies in just under 6 min with consumer computer hardware. Such speed enables PDFs to be derived in real time within analysis codes, solving potential storage issues. As part of this work we have developed galpro1, a highly intuitive and efficient python package to rapidly generate multivariate PDFs on-the-fly. galpro is documented and available for researchers to use in their cosmology and galaxy evolution studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mucesh, S., Hartley, W. G., Palmese, A., Lahav, O., Whiteway, L., Bluck, A. F. L., … Wilkinson, R. D. (2021). A machine learning approach to galaxy properties: Joint redshift-stellar mass probability distributions with Random Forest. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 502(2), 2770–2786. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab164

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free