Handheld computing predictions: What went wrong?

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Handheld computers have been criticized as one of the most excessively hyped new IT products of all time. This paper looks at handheld computing predictions made over a 10 year period, investigating what went wrong, and what went right, with handheld computing predictions. Handheld computing predictions can be divided into three phases, depending on the product concept definition widely held at the time: handheld computers as penbased computers, personal digital assistants, or handheld companions. While longer-term predictions were inflated in the first stage, they were surprisingly accurate in the second stage and excessively conservative in the third stage. The complaints about over enthusiasm and hype have more to do with incorrect product concept assumptions than poor guesses about the size of markets— technology directions are just as difficult to predict, or even more difficult, than technology sales.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allen, J. P. (1999). Handheld computing predictions: What went wrong? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1707, pp. 117–123). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48157-5_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free