Efficient fermentation of an improved synthetic grape must by enological and laboratory strains of saccharomyces cerevisiae

27Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Grape must or freshly pressed grape juice is a complex chemical matrix that impacts the efficiency of yeast fermentation. The composition of natural grape must (NGM) can be variable; thus, to ensure reproducibility, a synthetic grape must (SGM) with defined composition is commonly used. The aim of this work was to create conditions to advance the use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains for wine fermentation studies, considering previous results obtained for enological strains fermenting NGM under simulated winery conditions. We designed a new SGM formulation, ISA-SGM, by introducing specific modifications to a commonly used formulation, putting together previous reports. We added glucose and fructose in equal amounts (125 g/l) and 50 parts per million (ppm) sulfur dioxide (SO2, corresponding to standard enological treatment), and we optimized the concentrations of malic acid (3 g/l), citric acid (0.3 g/l), and tartaric acid (3 g/l). Using ISA-SGM, we obtained similar fermentative profiles for the wine strain ISA1000, the prototrophic strain S288C, and its auxotrophic derivative BY4741. In this case, the concentrations of supplements were optimized to 120 mg/l L-uracil, 80 mg/l L-methionine, 400 mg/l L-leucine, and 100 mg/l L-histidine. All these strains tested in ISA-SGM presented a similar fermentative performance as ISA1000 in NGM. ISA-SGM formulation is a promising new tool to allow the use of the auxotrophic BY strains in the detailed assessment of the alcoholic fermentation process under simulated winery conditions, and it provides a foundation to extract relevant physiological conclusions in future research on enological yeast traits. © 2014 Viana et al.; licensee Springer.

Figures

  • Figure 1 Fermentation performances of S. cerevisiae ISA1000, S288C indicate optical density for ISA1000 (▽), S288C (□) and BY4741 (◯ and red circ closed symbols. Glucose was completely consumed by ISA1000 and S288C st consumed in NGM (●), in NGM with auxotrophic supplements (1×) (blue circl symbol). All fermentations were performed at 25°C. Representative results of o
  • Table 1 Macrokinetic parameters for fermentations of NGM, RB-SGM and ISA-SGM by ISA1000, S288C and BY4741 strains
  • Figure 3 Fermentation performance of S. cerevisiae ISA1000 and BY4741 strains in NGM and in ISA-SGM. Open symbols indicate optical density for ISA1000 strain (▽) in NGM (black solid line) and in ISA-SGM (black dash line); for 2x auxotrophic supplemented NGM (red solid line) and ISA-SGM (red dash line) BY4741 growth is represented as (red circle symbol). Glucose was completely consumed for both strains (▼, red circle symbol) and in all media (solid and dash lines). All fermentations were performed at 25°C. Representative results of one of three independent experiments are shown. OD, optical density.
  • Figure 2 Fermentation performances of S. cerevisiae S288C strains in NGM, in RB-SGM and in ISA-SGM. Open squares (□) indicate optical density for S288C strain in NGM (solid line), in RB-SGM (dot line) and in ISA-SGM (dash line). Glucose (■) was completely consumed by S288C strain in NGM and in ISA-SGM, but in RB-SGM fermentation got stucked, lasting 35 g/l of residual sugar in the medium. All fermentations were performed at 25°C. Representative results of one of three independent experiments are shown. OD, optical density.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Viana, T., Loureiro-Dias, M. C., & Prista, C. (2014). Efficient fermentation of an improved synthetic grape must by enological and laboratory strains of saccharomyces cerevisiae. AMB Express, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-014-0016-0

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 41

76%

Researcher 9

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35

56%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 19

30%

Chemistry 6

10%

Chemical Engineering 3

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0