Zero-knowledge sets with short proofs

36Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Zero Knowledge Sets, introduced by Micali, Rabin and Kilian in [17], allow a prover to commit to a secret set S in a way such that it can later prove, non interactively, statements of the form x ε S (or x ε S), without revealing any further information (on top of what explicitly revealed by the inclusion/exclusion statements above) on S, not even its size. Later, Chase et al. [5] abstracted away the Micali, Rabin and Kilian's construction by introducing an elegant new variant of commitments that they called (trapdoor) mercurial commitments. Using this primitive, it was shown in [5,4] how to construct zero knowledge sets from a variety of assumptions (both general and number theoretic). In this paper we introduce the notion of trapdoor q-mercurial commitments (qTMCs), a notion of mercurial commitment that allows the sender to commit to an ordered sequence of exactly q messages, rather than to a single one. Following [17,5] we show how to construct ZKS from qTMCs and collision resistant hash functions. Then, we present an efficient realization of qTMCs that is secure under the so called Strong Diffie Hellman assumption, a number theoretic conjecture recently introduced by Boneh and Boyen in [3]. Using our scheme as basic building block, we obtain a construction of ZKS that allows for proofs that are much shorter with respect to the best previously known implementations. In particular, for an appropriate choice of the parameters, our proofs are up to 33% shorter for the case of proofs of membership, and up to 73% shorter for the case of proofs of non membership. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Catalano, D., Fiore, D., & Messina, M. (2008). Zero-knowledge sets with short proofs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4965 LNCS, pp. 433–450). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78967-3_25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free