Metabolic equivalents during the 10-m shuttle walking test for post-myocardial infarction patients

26Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Comorbidities are found to affect metabolic equivalents (METs). Therefore the main objective of this study was to compare METs (1 MET: oxygen uptake (VO2) 3.5 ml/kg/min) during an incremental shuttle walking test (SWT) between non-cardiac and post-myocardial infarction (MI) men, and secondly to determine any differences in VO2 (ml/kg/min) between flat treadmill walking and the turning during the shuttle walking in non-cardiac subjects. Design: Comparative study. Subjects: Thirty one post-MI (mean (SD) age 63.5 (6.5), range 53-77 years) from phase IV cardiac rehabilitation and 19 non-cardiac (64.6 (7.5), range 51-76 years) men participated. Methods: All subjects performed an SWT, and non-cardiac subjects a treadmill test of similar protocol. Throughout both, the subject's VO2 was measured. Results: Analysis comparing lines of regression showed METs at 1.12 to 4.16 mph were higher (p<0.001) for post-MIs versus non-cardiac subjects. For non-cardiac subjects, there were no differences between the treadmill test and SWT (p>0.9) and LoA showed acceptable agreement in METs between treadmill vs SWT, mean difference -1.1 (8.8) (1.96SD). Conclusion: It would appear that for asymptomatic individuals it is appropriate to apply established METs for flat walking to the SWT. However, the significantly higher METs for the post-MI compared with the non-cardiac subjects indicates the need for caution when using METs derived from healthy subjects in the prescription of exercise for myocardial patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woolf-May, K., & Ferrett, D. (2008). Metabolic equivalents during the 10-m shuttle walking test for post-myocardial infarction patients. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.034116

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free