Comparison of 4 sinus augmentation techniques for implant placement with residual alveolar bone height ≤3 mm

13Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study compared implant outcomes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) in edentulous patients with a residual alveolar bone height ≤3mm. Four techniques were evaluated: 1-stage bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure (BAOSFE) with simultaneous implant placement; 2-stage BAOSFE with delayed implant placement; 1-stage lateral window sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement; and 2-stage lateral window sinus floor elevation with delayed implant placement. Patients were followed for 18 to 72 months (mean: 52.5 months) after prosthesis placement. Data were analyzed with cone-beam computed tomography. A total of 96 implants from 71 patients were analyzed; pretreatment, there were no significant differences between patients. Total implant survival was 98.9%. The mean residual bone height was significantly higher in the 1-stage BAOSFE group than the other groups (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsai, C. F., Pan, W. L., Pan, Y. P., Chan, C. P., Ju, Y. R., Wang, Y. M., … Zheng, L. W. (2020). Comparison of 4 sinus augmentation techniques for implant placement with residual alveolar bone height ≤3 mm. Medicine (United States), 99(46), E23180. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023180

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free