Monitoring of gustatory stimulation of salivary glands by diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Comparison of 1.5T and 3T

34Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare different field strengths monitoring physiologic changes due to oral stimulation of parotid glands by using diffusion-weighted (DW) echo-planar imaging (EPI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were examined with a DW-EPI sequence at 1.5T and 3T before and after oral stimulation with commercially available lemon juice. The b factors used were 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were evaluated with a manually placed region of interest including the entire parotid gland. For comparison of results, a Student t test was used on the basis of the mean of the volunteer median values. To compare both field strengths, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: DW-EPI MR imaging visualized the parotid glands of all volunteers. With 1.5T, the mean ADC before stimulation was 1.12 × 10-3 mm 2/s ± 0.08 × 10-3 mm2/s. After stimulation with lemon juice, the ADC increased to 1.18 × 10-3 mm2/s ± 0.09 × 10~3 mm2/s. For 3T, the ADC before stimulation was 1.14 × 10-3 mm2/s ± 0.04 × 10-3 mm2/s, with an increase to 1.17 × 10-3 mm2/s ± 0.05 × 10-3 mm 2/s after stimulation. For both field strengths, the increase in ADC after stimulation was significant (P < .001). High correlations between both field strengths were found pre- and poststimulation (r = 0.955, and 0.936, respectively). CONCLUSION: DW-EPI MR imaging allows monitoring of physiologic changes due to oral stimulation of parotid glands by using DW imaging with high correlation between 1.5T and 3T.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Habermann, C. R., Gossrau, P., Kooijman, H., Graessner, J., Cramer, M. C., Kaul, M. G., … Adam, G. (2007). Monitoring of gustatory stimulation of salivary glands by diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Comparison of 1.5T and 3T. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 28(8), 1547–1551. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0587

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free