DEKONSTRUKSI PENGAWASAN PERATURAN DAERAH SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA

  • Mulyani B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision of Number 137/PUU-XIII/2015and Decision Number 56/PUU-XIV/2016 which state that theauthority of the Minister of Home Affairs and the Governor asthe representative of the central government in cancelingProvincial Regulations, District Regulation/City Regulation,Governor Regulation, and Regent Regulation/Regulation ofMayor was inconstitutional. So only the Supreme Court has theauthority to revoke Provincial Regulations, DistrictRegulation/City Regulations, Governor Regulation, and RegentRegulation/Regulation of Mayor. This analysis makes use of thelegal juridical normative research method. The results showthat in a state of unity it is appropriate that higher levels ofgovernment are given the authority to supervise theregulations set in the regions. The supervision can beimplemented by conducting such a guidance to the regionthrough the strengthening of executive preview or legal normreview before it is legally binding in general

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mulyani, B. (2020). DEKONSTRUKSI PENGAWASAN PERATURAN DAERAH SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA. JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani, 2(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.46601/juridica.v2i1.183

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 9

64%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

21%

Researcher 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 12

71%

Arts and Humanities 3

18%

Energy 1

6%

Computer Science 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free