Scientific peer review: Guidelines for Informative Peer Review

  • Starck J
ISSN: 00664200
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

What to find in this essential: • A short analysis of basic principles how science works, how science is communicated, and how it is published. • A comprehensive presentation of how to write a review for a scientific journal. • A discussion of ethical guidelines applicable in scientific publishing. • An analysis and critique of various peer review procedures so that inherent problems become transparent, alternative options are recognized, and possible solutions can be found.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Starck, J. M. (2011). Scientific peer review: Guidelines for Informative Peer Review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 45, pp. 197–245). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free