Reflections on inductive thematic saturation as a potential metric for measuring the validity of an inductive thematic analysis with LLMs

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper presents a set of reflections on saturation and the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for performing Thematic Analysis (TA). The paper suggests that initial thematic saturation (ITS) could be used as a metric to assess part of the transactional validity of TA with LLM, focusing on the initial coding. The paper presents the initial coding of two datasets of different sizes, and it reflects on how the LLM reaches some form of analytical saturation during the coding. The procedure proposed in this work leads to the creation of two codebooks, one comprising the total cumulative initial codes and the other the total unique codes. The paper proposes a metric to synthetically measure ITS using a simple mathematical calculation employing the ratio between slopes of the unique and total codes. The paper contributes to the initial body of work exploring how to perform qualitative analysis with LLMs.

References Powered by Scopus

Using thematic analysis in psychology

110426Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization

6776Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests

2190Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Paoli, S., & Mathis, W. S. (2024). Reflections on inductive thematic saturation as a potential metric for measuring the validity of an inductive thematic analysis with LLMs. Quality and Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01950-6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 2

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free