Opening the black box of implementing activation in Ireland

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper focuses on Ireland's 'activation turn' and the roll-out of the Pathways to Work policy, contextualising these reforms within recent international developments in activation. Using a qualitative approach, the study explores the perceptions of a range of key stakeholders-jobseekers, employment guidance practitioners, employment service managers, ancillary services and policymakers-offering some important insights into Ireland's move towards activation and the implementation of Pathways to Work. Three overarching themes were identified: Depersonalisation, the missing 'how to' of implementation, and the reform agenda. These findings, although tentative, provide a new understanding of the perceptions of key stakeholders, described as 'insiders' and 'outsiders', and their views about both implementation and perceived effectiveness.

References Powered by Scopus

Unemployment impairs mental health: Meta-analyses

1819Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Active labour market policy evaluations: A meta-analysis

582Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The political economy of active labor-market policy

334Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A period of contention? The politics of post-crisis activation reform and the creeping marketisation of public employment services

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Remodeling Street-Level Workers With Quasi-Markets: Comparing Ireland’s Mixed Economy of Welfare-to-Work

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meeting the numbers: Performance politics and welfare-to-work at the street-level

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Whelan, N. (2021). Opening the black box of implementing activation in Ireland. Administration, 69(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2021-0015

Readers over time

‘21‘2202468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 1

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0