Sex preference and interest in preconception sex selection: A survey among pregnant women in the north of Jordan

11Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons is a controversial issue in bioethics. Little research has described preferences for preconception sex selection among Arab populations. This study describes the sex preference and interest in employing sex selection techniques among pregnant women in northern Jordan.METHODSA self-reported questionnaire was administered to 600 pregnant women in Irbid, Jordan. χ2 test and binary logistic regression were used to examine the factors associated with interest in preconception sex selection.RESULTSIn general, the interest in using sex selection was low. Women who preferred boys were more likely to be interested in sex selection, if paid for by the couple [odds ratio (OR) = 4.40, 95 confidence interval (CI): 1.75-11.11] or by health insurance (OR = 3.42, 95 CI: 1.94-6.06), or, if feasible, administered through oral medication (OR = 8.84, 95 CI: 5.05-15.63). Women with lower education were more likely to be interested in sex selection, if paid by health insurance (OR = 1.96, 95 CI: 1.10-3.45) and were more likely to believe that sex selection is legal (OR = 1.79, 95 CI: 1.06-2.86). Women who had no boys were more likely to be interested in sex selection, if paid by health insurance (OR = 1.94, 95 CI: 1.10-3.42) or, if feasible, through medication (OR = 3.03, 95 CI: 1.82-5.00).CONCLUSIONSThe majority of participants were not in favor of using preconception sex selection. Those with a preference to have boys, with lower education, and those with an imbalanced family were more likely to be interested in using sex selection technology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmad Al-Akour, N., Khassawneh, M., Khader, Y., & Dahl, E. (2009). Sex preference and interest in preconception sex selection: A survey among pregnant women in the north of Jordan. Human Reproduction, 24(7), 1665–1669. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep080

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free