Electromyographical Comparison of Four Common Shoulder Exercises in Unstable and Stable Shoulders

  • Sciascia A
  • Kuschinsky N
  • Nitz A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
146Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study examines if electromyographic (EMG) amplitude differences exist between patients with shoulder instability and healthy controls performing scaption, prone horizontal abduction, prone external rotation, and push-up plus shoulder rehabilitation exercises. Thirty nine subjects were categorized by a single orthopedic surgeon as having multidirectional instability ( n = 10 ), anterior instability ( n = 9 ), generalized laxity ( n = 10 ), or a healthy shoulder ( n = 10 ). Indwelling and surface electrodes were utilized to measure EMG activity (reported as a % of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)) in various shoulder muscles during 4 common shoulder exercises. The exercises studied effectively activated the primary musculature targeted in each exercise equally among all groups. The serratus anterior generated high activity (50–80% MVIC) during a push-up plus, while the infraspinatus and teres major generated moderate-to-high activity (30–80% MVIC) during both the prone horizontal and prone external rotation exercises. Scaption exercise generated moderate activity (20–50% MVIC) in both rotator cuff and scapular musculature. Clinicians should feel confident in prescribing these shoulder-strengthening exercises in patients with shoulder instability as the activation levels are comparable to previous findings regarding EMG amplitudes and should improve the dynamic stabilization capability of both rotator cuff and scapular muscles using exercises designed to address glenohumeral joint instability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sciascia, A., Kuschinsky, N., Nitz, A. J., Mair, S. D., & Uhl, T. L. (2012). Electromyographical Comparison of Four Common Shoulder Exercises in Unstable and Stable Shoulders. Rehabilitation Research and Practice, 2012, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/783824

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free