MR measurement of visceral fat: Assessment of metabolic syndrome

20Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One diagnostic criterion for metabolic syndrome is obesity from the accumulation of visceral fat; others include abdominal circumference and area of visceral fat as measured by computed tomography (CT) at the umbilical level. We evaluated visceral fat using frequency-selective excitation magnetic resonance (MR) imaging SPAIR (spectral attenuation with inversion recovery) water suppression THRIVE (3D T1-high resolution isotropic volume examination). Fifty of 70 slices with 2-mm interval were used to render and measure volume of visceral fat ranging within 10 cm of the umbilicus; the area of visceral fat at the umbilical level was also measured. Imaging was completed using breath hold within 14 s. Image processing was easier than using CT.

References Powered by Scopus

New criteria for 'obesity disease' in Japan

1614Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Definition and the diagnostic standard for metabolic syndrome--Committee to Evaluate Diagnostic Standards for Metabolic Syndrome

0
344Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparison of 3 T MRI and CT for the measurement of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in humans

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison between two methods of bioelectrical impedance analyses for accuracy in measuring abdominal visceral fat area

89Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of automatic visceral fat volume calculation software for CT volume data

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tanaka, S., Yoshiyama, M., Imanishi, Y., Nakahira, K., Hanaki, T., Naito, Y., … Tanaka, M. (2006). MR measurement of visceral fat: Assessment of metabolic syndrome. Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, 5(4), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.5.207

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘20‘21‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

57%

Researcher 6

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

60%

Engineering 3

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

15%

Sports and Recreations 2

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0