Reachable sets of classifiers and regression models: (non-)robustness analysis and robust training

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Neural networks achieve outstanding accuracy in classification and regression tasks. However, understanding their behavior still remains an open challenge that requires questions to be addressed on the robustness, explainability and reliability of predictions. We answer these questions by computing reachable sets of neural networks, i.e. sets of outputs resulting from continuous sets of inputs. We provide two efficient approaches that lead to over- and under-approximations of the reachable set. This principle is highly versatile, as we show. First, we use it to analyze and enhance the robustness properties of both classifiers and regression models. This is in contrast to existing works, which are mainly focused on classification. Specifically, we verify (non-)robustness, propose a robust training procedure, and show that our approach outperforms adversarial attacks as well as state-of-the-art methods of verifying classifiers for non-norm bound perturbations. Second, we provide techniques to distinguish between reliable and non-reliable predictions for unlabeled inputs, to quantify the influence of each feature on a prediction, and compute a feature ranking.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kopetzki, A. K., & Günnemann, S. (2021). Reachable sets of classifiers and regression models: (non-)robustness analysis and robust training. Machine Learning, 110(6), 1175–1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-021-05973-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free