The Case for Establishing a Collective Perspective to Address the Harms of Platform Personalization

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Personalization on digital platforms drives a broad range of harms, including misinformation, manipulation, social polarization, subversion of autonomy, and discrimination. In recent years, policymakers, civil society advocates, and researchers have proposed a wide range of interventions to address these challenges. In this article, we argue that the emerging toolkit reflects an individualistic view of both personal data and data-driven harms that will likely be inadequate to address growing harms in the global data ecosystem. We maintain that interventions must be grounded in an understanding of the fundamentally collective nature of data, wherein platforms leverage complex patterns of behaviors and characteristics observed across a large population to draw inferences and make predictions about individuals. Using the lens of the collective nature of data, we evaluate various approaches to addressing personalization-driven harms currently under consideration. This lens also allows us to frame concrete guidance for future legislation in this space and advocate meaningful transparency that goes far beyond current proposals. We offer a roadmap for what meaningful transparency must constitute: a collective perspective providing a third party with ongoing insight into the information gathered and observed about individuals and how it correlates with any personalized content they receive-across a large, representative population. These insights would enable the third party to understand, identify, quantify, and address cases of personalization-driven harms. We discuss how such transparency can be achieved without sacrificing privacy and provide guidelines for legislation to support the development of this proposal.

References Powered by Scopus

Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis

5223Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks

2271Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior

1867Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Terms-we-serve-with: Five dimensions for anticipating and repairing algorithmic harm

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An Epistemic Lens on Algorithmic Fairness

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reimagining Decentralized AI

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gordon-Tapiero, A., Wood, A., & Ligett, K. (2022). The Case for Establishing a Collective Perspective to Address the Harms of Platform Personalization. In CSLAW 2022 - Proceedings of the 2022 Symposium on Computer Science and Law (pp. 119–130). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511265.3550450

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 3

60%

Computer Science 1

20%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0