Agreement in the scoring of respiratory events among international sleep centers for home sleep testing

29Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Study Objectives: Home sleep testing (HST) is used worldwide to confirm the presence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We sought to determine the agreement of HST scoring among international sleep centers. Methods: Fifteen HSTs, previously recorded using a type 3 monitor, were deidentified and saved in European Data Format. The studies were scored by nine technologists from the sleep centers of the Sleep Apnea Global Interdisciplinary Consortium (SAGIC) using the locally available software. Each study was scored separately using one of three different airflow signals: nasal pressure (NP), transformed (square root) nasal pressure signal (transformed NP), and uncalibrated respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP) flow. Only one of the three airflow signals was visible to the scorer at each scoring session. The scoring procedure was repeated to determine the intrarater reliability. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) using the NP were: apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) = 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-0.99); apnea index = 0.91 (0.83-0.96); and hypopnea index = 0.75 (0.59-0.89). The ICCs using the transformed NP were: AHI = 0.98 (0.96-0.99); apnea index = 0.95 (0.90-0.98); and hypopnea index = 0.90 (0.82-0.96). The ICCs using the RIP flow were: AH I = 0.98 (0.96-0.99); apnea index = 0.66 (0.48-0.84); and hypopnea index = 0.78 (0.63-0.90). The mean difference of first and second scoring sessions of the same respiratory variables ranged from-1.02 to 0.75/h. Conclusion: There is a strong agreement in the scoring of the respiratory events for HST among international sleep centers. Our results suggest that centralized scoring of HSTs may not be necessary in future research collaboration among international sites. Commentary: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 7.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring agreement in method comparison studies

7601Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prospective study of the association between sleep-disordered breathing and hypertension

4248Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: Update of the 2007 AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events

4198Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Recognizable clinical subtypes of obstructive sleep apnea across international sleep centers: A cluster analysis

164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A global comparison of anatomic risk factors and their relationship to obstructive sleep apnea severity in clinical samples

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning-Derived OSA Prediction Tools in Large Clinical and Community-Based Samples

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magalang, U. J., Arnardottir, E. S., Chen, N. H., Cistulli, P. A., Gíslason, T., Lim, D., … Pack, A. I. (2016). Agreement in the scoring of respiratory events among international sleep centers for home sleep testing. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 12(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.5398

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

69%

Researcher 7

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 9

38%

Medicine and Dentistry 9

38%

Neuroscience 4

17%

Physics and Astronomy 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free