The effect of entrepreneurship education programmes on the development of self-efficacy, entrepreneurial intention and predictions for entrepreneurial activity

25Citations
Citations of this article
190Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Orientation: South Africa is currently facing a youth unemployment crisis. Confirmation of the problem was situated in our review of the Quarterly Labour Force Survey, Quarter 3, 2015. We found that the 15–24 years age group was most affected where many were neither in employment, education or training. We asked whether the promotion of entrepreneurship among youth could be a potential solution. Research purpose: Our research sought to investigate whether there existed a correlation between exposure to entrepreneurship education (EE) and the development of self-efficacy in high school South African youth in the age group of 15–18 years. We also investigated if the programme duration would influence the degree to which self-efficacy was developed, and the correlation of self-efficacy with entrepreneurial and entrepreneurial intention as a predictor of entrepreneurial activity. Motivation for the study: Our motivation stemmed from the belief that the youth unemployment crisis will not be solved by formal employment; that entrepreneurship education needed to be promoted at the school level to address skills mismatches between education and employment creation. Research design, approach and method: We collected our data through a questionnaire from two samples of students taking the Junior Achievement programme. The study adopted a quantitative approach and adopted the use of a Likert scale questionnaire. Of the 1 200 questionnaires distributed, 637 were usable for the short entrepreneurship education programme and 381 were usable for the long entrepreneurship education programme. The purposive sampling technique was adopted. We collected data around the participants’ perceptions of self-efficacy post-entrepreneurship education intervention. We used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Model (SEM) to analyse our data. Our tests of reliability and validity by use of CFA and SEM confirmed that we were using a stable model. Main findings: The research found positive correlations between the items comprising self-efficacy that can be developed through EE. Also, EE of a longer duration had stronger positive correlations with such items. Practical/managerial implications: We make practical recommendations pertinent to the type of EE schools ought to introduce. Contribution/value-add: Our research contributed to existing theory about the influence of EE on the development of self-efficacy.

References Powered by Scopus

Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources

1579Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A competency-based perspective on entrepreneurship education: Conceptual and empirical insights

457Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A narrative perspective on entrepreneurial opportunities

185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fostering sustainable ventures: Drivers of sustainable start-up intentions among aspiring university students in Pakistan

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Endorsing Sustainable Enterprises Among Promising Entrepreneurs: A Comparative Study of Factor-Driven Economy and Efficiency-Driven Economy

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards the development of future sustainable sports entrepreneurs: An asymmetric approach of the sports sciences sustainable entrepreneurial intentions

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bux, S., & van Vuuren, J. (2019). The effect of entrepreneurship education programmes on the development of self-efficacy, entrepreneurial intention and predictions for entrepreneurial activity. Acta Commercii, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v19i2.615

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

48%

Lecturer / Post doc 21

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

12%

Researcher 5

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 38

62%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12

20%

Social Sciences 7

11%

Engineering 4

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free