Barriers and facilitators to improving patient safety learning systems: A systematic review of qualitative studies and meta-synthesis

9Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background The implementation and continuous improvement of patient safety learning systems (PSLS) is a principal strategy for mitigating preventable harm to patients. Although substantial efforts have sought to improve these systems, there is a need to more comprehensively understand critical success factors. This study aims to summarise the barriers and facilitators perceived by hospital staff and physicians to influence the reporting, analysis, learning and feedback within PSLS in hospitals. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-synthesis by searching MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science. We included English-language manuscripts of qualitative studies evaluating effectiveness of the PSLS and excluded studies evaluating specific individual adverse events, such as systems for tracking only medication side effects, for example. We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. Results We extracted data from 22 studies, after screening 2475 for inclusion/exclusion criteria. The included studies focused on reporting aspects of the PSLS, however, there were important barriers and facilitators across the analysis, learning and feedback phases. We identified the following barriers for effective use of PSLS: inadequate organisational support with shortage of resources, lack of training, weak safety culture, lack of accountability, defective policies, blame and a punitive environment, complex system, lack of experience and lack of feedback. We identified the following enabling factors: continuous training, a balance between accountability and responsibility, leaders as role models, anonymous reporting, user-friendly systems, well-structured analysis teams, tangible improvement. Conclusion Multiple barriers and facilitators to uptake of PSLS exist. These factors should be considered by decision makers seeking to enhance the impact of PSLS. Ethics and dissemination No formal ethical approval or consent were required as no primary data were collected.

References Powered by Scopus

Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process

639Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The problem of appraising qualitative research

438Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Attitudes of doctors and nurses towards incident reporting: A qualitative analysis

236Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

What is the effectiveness of reporting systems in promoting learning in healthcare?

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hospital ward incidents through the eyes of nurses – A thick description on the appeal and deadlock of incident reporting systems

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE EMPLOYEE PERSONAL ATTITUDE TOWARD REPORTING PATIENT SAFETY INCIDENTS

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mahmoud, H. A., Thavorn, K., Mulpuru, S., McIsaac, D., Abdelrazek, M. A., Mahmoud, A. A., & Forster, A. J. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to improving patient safety learning systems: A systematic review of qualitative studies and meta-synthesis. BMJ Open Quality, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002134

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2509182736

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

78%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 6

43%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

29%

Computer Science 2

14%

Arts and Humanities 2

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0