Epistemology of forecasting in international relations: Knowing the difference between ‘intelligence failure’ and ‘warning failure’

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Too often ‘intelligence failure’ and ‘warning failure’ are used interchangeably. These terms are considered equal parts of a forecasting equation, if they are considered separate entities at all. Mostly, they are perceived as two interchangeable terms, with the assumption that one necessarily leads to the other. This may be because analysts (those who are involved in producing intelligence products) and policymakers (those who are involved in consuming intelligence products) do not, or care not to, understand the different values and variables placed on ‘warning’ and ‘intelligence’.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goldman, J. (2011). Epistemology of forecasting in international relations: Knowing the difference between ‘intelligence failure’ and ‘warning failure.’ In Forecasting, Warning and Responding to Transnational Risks (pp. 33–46). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230316911_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free