Does adaptive provision of learning activities improve learning in SQL-tutor?

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Tutored Problem Solving (PS), worked examples (WE) and Erroneous Examples (ErrEx) have all been proven to be effective in supporting learning. We previously found that learning from a fixed sequence of alternating WE/PS pairs and ErrEx/PS pairs (WPEP) was beneficial for students in comparison to learning from a fixed sequence of PS and WEs [1]. In this paper, we introduce an adaptive strategy which determines which learning activities (a WE, a 1-error ErrEx, a 2-error ErrEx or a problem to be solved) to provide to the student based on the score the student obtained on the previous problem. We compared the adaptive strategy to the fixed WPEP strategy, and found that students in the adaptive condition significantly improved their post-test scores on conceptual, procedural and debugging questions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, X., Mitrovic, A., & Mathews, M. (2017). Does adaptive provision of learning activities improve learning in SQL-tutor? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10331 LNAI, pp. 476–479). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_44

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free