Handling time varying confounding in observational research

266Citations
Citations of this article
378Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many exposures of epidemiological interest are time varying, and the values of potential confounders may change over time leading to time varying confounding. The aim of many longitudinal studies is to estimate the causal effect of a time varying exposure on an outcome that requires adjusting for time varying confounding. Time varying confounding affected by previous exposure often occurs in practice, but it is usually adjusted for by using conventional analytical methods such as time dependent Cox regression, random effects models, or generalised estimating equations, which are known to provide biased effect estimates in this setting. This article explains time varying confounding affected by previous exposure and outlines three causal methods proposed to appropriately adjust for this potential bias: inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting, the parametric G formula, and G estimation.

References Powered by Scopus

Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology

4084Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research

3109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies

1484Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Epidemiology: An introduction

1478Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Time-series forecasting with deep learning: A survey

881Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Population attributable fraction

290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mansournia, M. A., Etminan, M., Danaei, G., Kaufman, J. S., & Collins, G. (2017). Handling time varying confounding in observational research. BMJ (Online), 359. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4587

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 138

55%

Researcher 80

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 24

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 139

73%

Nursing and Health Professions 18

9%

Mathematics 18

9%

Social Sciences 15

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 7

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free