Malignant hyperthermia: "It certainly is" versus "it certainly is not!"

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The first case of the day in room 12 is a 4-year-old boy who is scheduled for a bilateral inguinal hernia repair. Three days before the procedure, the child had presented to pre-surgical testing for evaluation. Pertinent history includes birth at 31-week gestation, and predictably, the common morbidities of a premature infant, including lack of lung surfactant requiring a week of intubation and ventilation, apnea of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), hyperbilirubinemia, a grade 2 intraventricular hemorrhage, and 2 seizures. Luckily, all of these problems have resolved. The child did receive an ill-defined anesthetic for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line during his initial hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The Mandarin-speaking father reported that the child needed 3 days of postoperative mechanical ventilation due to lung problems related to prematurity. He did not recall any other problems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scher, C. S. (2016). Malignant hyperthermia: “It certainly is” versus “it certainly is not!” In You’re Wrong, I’m Right: Dueling Authors Reexamine Classic Teachings in Anesthesia (pp. 143–145). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43169-7_43

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free