Chlamydia trachomatis load in population-based screening and STI-clinics: Implications for screening policy

21Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: If the Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) bacterial load is higher in high-risk populations than in the general population, this negatively affects the efficacy of CT screening incentives. In the largest retrospective study to date, we investigated the CT load in specimens collected from 2 cohorts: (1) attendants of a sexually transmitted infection (STI)-clinic and (2) participants of the Dutch population-based screening (PBS). Methods: CT load was determined using quantitative PCR in CT-positive male urine and female cervicovaginal swabs. CT loads were converted into tertiles. Using multinominal logistic regression, independent association of cohort, symptoms, risk behaviour and human cell count on load were assessed. Results: CT loads were determined in 889 CT-positives from PBS (n = 529; 71.8% female) and STIclinics (n = 360; 61.7% female). In men, STI-clinic-cohort, human cell count and urethral discharge were positively associated with CT load. In women, PBS-cohort and cell count were positively associated with CT load. Both cohorts had the same range in CT load. Conclusions: The general population has a similar range of bacterial CT load as a high-risk population, but a different distribution for cohort and gender, highlighting the relevance of populationbased CT-screening. When CT loads are similar, possibly the chances of transmission and sequelae are too.

References Powered by Scopus

Estimation of Average Concentration in the Presence of Nondetectable Values

2882Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Viral load and heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

2611Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Immunology of Chlamydia infection: Implications for a Chlamydia trachomatis vaccine

503Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

What is needed to guide testing for anorectal and pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women and men? Evidence and opinion

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Viability-PCR shows That NAAT detects a high proportion of DNA from non-viable chlamydia trachomatis

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intravaginal Chlamydia trachomatis challenge infection elicits T<inf>H</inf>1 and T<inf>H</inf>17 immune responses in mice that promote pathogen clearance and genital tract damage

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dirks, J. A. M. C., Wolffs, P. F. G., Dukers-Muijrers, N. H. T. M., Brink, A. A. T. P., Speksnijder, A. G. C. L., & Hoebe, C. J. P. A. (2015). Chlamydia trachomatis load in population-based screening and STI-clinics: Implications for screening policy. PLoS ONE, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121433

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

54%

Researcher 6

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

41%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

19%

Engineering 4

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free