Chronic conditions in women: the development of a National Institutes of health framework

26Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Rising rates of chronic conditions were cited as one of the key public health concerns in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 U.S. Senate and House of Representatives appropriations bills, where a review of current National Institutes of Health (NIH) portfolios relevant to research on women’s health was requested. Chronic conditions were last defined by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in 2010. However, existing definitions of chronic conditions do not incorporate sex or gender considerations. Sex and gender influence health, yet significant knowledge gaps exist in the evidence-base for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic diseases amongst women. The presentation, prevalence, and long-term effects of chronic conditions and multimorbidity differs in women from men. A clinical framework was developed to adequately assess the NIH investment in research related to chronic conditions in women. The public health needs and NIH investment related to conditions included in the framework were measured. By available measures, research within the NIH has not mapped to the burden of chronic conditions among women. Clinical research questions and endpoints centered around women can be developed and implemented; clinical trials networks with expanded or extended eligibility criteria can be created; and data science could be used to extrapolate the effects of overlapping or multiple morbidities on the health of women. Aligning NIH research priorities to address the specific needs of women with chronic diseases is critical to addressing women’s health needs from a life course perspective.

References Powered by Scopus

High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: Ultrasound evidence

1796Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sex and gender differences in risk, pathophysiology and complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus

1294Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease

1183Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Are we moving the dial? Canadian health research funding trends for women’s health, 2S/LGBTQ + health, sex, or gender considerations

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new vision for women's health research: Transformative change at the national institutes of health

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The State of the U.S. Biomedical and Health Research Enterprise: Strategies for Achieving a Healthier America

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Temkin, S. M., Barr, E., Moore, H., Caviston, J. P., Regensteiner, J. G., & Clayton, J. A. (2023, December 1). Chronic conditions in women: the development of a National Institutes of health framework. BMC Women’s Health. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02319-x

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

62%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

15%

Researcher 4

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 11

41%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

37%

Social Sciences 5

19%

Computer Science 1

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 10
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0