Hypofractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy for breast cancer: A propensity-score-weighted comparison of radiation-related toxicity

15Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We assessed the clinical benefit of combining volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF-RT) considering the incidence of radiation-related toxicities. After a retrospective review for breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant RT between 2005 and 2017, a total of 4209 patients treated with three-dimensional conventional fractionation (CF-3D, 50.4 Gy/28 fractions) and 1540 patients treated with HF-RT (768 received HF-3D; 772, HF-VMAT; 40 Gy/15 fractions) were included. A total of 2229 patients (38.8%) received regional node irradiation (RNI): 1642 (39.0%), 167 (21.7%) and 420 (54.4%) received RNI via CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively. Acute/subacute and late toxicities were evaluated. Propensity scores were calculated via logistic regression. Grade 2+ acute/subacute toxicities was the highest in CF-3D group (15.0%, 2.6% and 1.6% in CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, N., Chang, J. S., Shah, C., Shin, H., Keum, K. C., Suh, C. O., & Kim, Y. B. (2021). Hypofractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy for breast cancer: A propensity-score-weighted comparison of radiation-related toxicity. International Journal of Cancer, 149(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33525

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free