The current state of epilepsy guidelines: A systematic review

54Citations
Citations of this article
301Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Summary Objective The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Epilepsy Guidelines Task Force, composed of 14 international members, was established in 2011 to identify, using systematic review methodology, international epilepsy clinical care guidelines, assess their quality, and determine gaps in areas of need of development. Methods A systematic review of the literature (1985-2014) was performed in six electronic databases (e.g. Medline, Embase) using a broad search strategy without initial limits to language or study design. Six gray literature databases (e.g., American Academy of Neurology [AAN], ILAE) were also searched to minimize publication bias. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, reviewed full text articles, and performed data abstraction. Descriptive statistics and a meta-analysis were generated. Results The search identified 10,926 abstracts. Of the 410 articles selected for full text review, 63 met our eligibility criteria for a guideline. Of those included, 54 were in English and 9 were in other languages (French, Spanish, and Italian). Of all guidelines, 29% did not specify the target age groups, 27% were focused on adults, 22% included only children, and 6% specifically addressed issues related to women with epilepsy. Guidelines included in the review were most often aimed at guiding clinical practice for status epilepticus (n = 7), first seizure (n = 6), drug-resistant epilepsy (n = 5), and febrile seizures (n = 4), among others. Most of the guidelines were therapeutic (n = 35) or diagnostic (n = 16) in nature. The quality of the guidelines using a 1-7 point scale (7 = highest) varied and was moderate overall (mean = 4.99 ± 1.05 [SD]). Significance We identified substantial gaps in topics (e.g., epilepsy in the elderly) and there was considerable heterogeneity in methodologic quality. The findings should offer a valuable resource for health professionals caring for people with epilepsy, since they will help guide the prioritization, development, and dissemination of future epilepsy-related guidelines.

References Powered by Scopus

Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines?: A framework for improvement

5621Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Revised terminology and concepts for organization of seizures and epilepsies: Report of the ILAE Commission on Classification and Terminology, 2005-2009

3580Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care

2789Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Surgical treatment for epilepsy: the potential gap between evidence and practice

151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epilepsy treatment in adults and adolescents: Expert opinion, 2016

89Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epilepsy in an elderly population: Classification, etiology and drug resistance

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sauro, K. M., Wiebe, S., Dunkley, C., Janszky, J., Kumlien, E., Moshé, S., … Jetté, N. (2016, January 1). The current state of epilepsy guidelines: A systematic review. Epilepsia. Blackwell Publishing Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13273

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 107

69%

Researcher 32

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 123

70%

Neuroscience 24

14%

Nursing and Health Professions 18

10%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 10

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free