Construction and Constitution in Mathematics

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I argue that Brouwer’s notion of the construction of purely mathematical objects and Husserl’s notion of their constitution by the transcendental subject coincide. Various objections to Brouwer’s intuitionism that have been raised in recent phenomenological literature (by Hill, Rosado Haddock, and Tieszen) are addressed. Then I present objections to Gödel’s project of founding classical mathematics on transcendental phenomenology. The problem for that project lies not so much in Husserl’s insistence on the spontaneous character of the constitution of mathematical objects, or in his refusal to allow an appeal to higher minds, as in the combination of these two attitudes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Atten, M. (2015). Construction and Constitution in Mathematics. In Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (Vol. 35, pp. 237–288). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10031-9_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free