The "public" in "public peace process" and in "mini-publics:" A dialogue between democratic theory and peace studies

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The recent attention of peace studies scholars to the role of the "public" parallels an increased interest of democratic theorists in the legitimacy of "mini-publics:" initiatives that bring small groups of citizens together to discuss policy issues. In fact, democratic activists and peace activists who seek to engage the public face similar theoretical and practical challenges. The purpose of this article is to contribute to an emerging dialogue between the disciplines of democratic theory and peace studies. Such a dialogue can be beneficial in at least two ways: it allows an exploration of the role of legitimacy in public peace processes and the burdens that legitimacy put on the institutional design of such processes, and it allows an exploration of more ambitious models of public participation in the peace process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ron, A. (2010). The “public” in “public peace process” and in “mini-publics:” A dialogue between democratic theory and peace studies. Peace and Conflict Studies, 17(2), 347–377. https://doi.org/10.46743/1082-7307/2010.1120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free