A systematic approach to express IS evolution requirements using gap modelling and similarity modelling techniques

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Gaps and similarities are two important concepts used in Information System (IS) projects that deal with the evolution issue. The idea in using these concepts is to analyse what changes or what remains similar between two situations, typically the changed situation and the new one, rather than just describing the new situation. Although in the industry, the daily practice consists in expressing evolution requirements with gaps and similarities, little attention has been paid in research to better systematically define these two kinds of concepts so as to better support the expression of evolution requirements. This paper proposes an approach that combines meta-modelling with generic typologies of gap operators and similarity predicates. Our purpose is not to define yet another requirement modelling language. On the contrary, the two generic typologies can be adapted to existing modelling language such as Use Cases, I* and KAOS goal models, Goal/Strategy maps, Entity-Relationship diagrams, and Workflow models. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

References Powered by Scopus

4565Citations
1148Readers
277Citations
109Readers
Get full text
151Citations
35Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salinesi, C., Etien, A., & Zoukar, I. (2004). A systematic approach to express IS evolution requirements using gap modelling and similarity modelling techniques. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3084, 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25975-6_25

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

27%

Researcher 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 12

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free