Using two climate change vulnerability assessment methods to prioritize and manage rare plants: A case study

20Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Climate change is altering environments where rare plants grow. Assessing species' vulnerability to climate change is important for organizations responsible for managing natural areas and conserving rare species. We assessed the climate change vulnerability of 34 rare plant taxa from the western United States using two methods: NatureServe's Climate Change Vulnerability Index (CCVI) and one based on Species Distribution Modeling (SDM) using Maxent. Of the eight taxa categorized as Extremely Vulnerable by the CCVI, five show significant future loss in each of three SDM measures: change in suitable area, suitable area overlap, and habitat suitability in their present location. Both the CCVI and SDM are important tools to assess climate change vulnerability; each method has complementary strengths that can help land managers make decisions. Here we present examples of how land managers can use SDM and the CCVI in combination to assess climate change vulnerability, to inform rare plant management decisions, and to conserve biological diversity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Still, S. M., Frances, A. L., Treher, A. C., & Oliver, L. (2015). Using two climate change vulnerability assessment methods to prioritize and manage rare plants: A case study. Natural Areas Journal, 35(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.035.0115

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free