Determining the machining allowance for WAAM parts

30Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In order to decrease mass, and thus fulfil the targets for airplane traffic emission reduction, the amount of titanium alloys used for structural components is rising. With the conventional milling process, low material utilization and short tool life lead to high manufacturing costs. Therefore, a process chain consisting of wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) and machining is developed. To realize its full potential, the machining process needs to be adapted to the near-net shaped components. A special focus lies on the machining allowance, since it influences both processes and in result the final part quality. In this paper a method to model the machining allowance is proposed and verified by analysing the changes from waviness to surface roughness occurring during peripheral milling of WAAM parts.

References Powered by Scopus

Progress in structural materials for aerospace systems

2268Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Wire + Arc additive manufacturing

1397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Low cost integration of additive and subtractive processes for hybrid layered manufacturing

345Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The current state of research of wire arc additive manufacturing (Waam): A review

142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Robust Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Selection and Development for Aerospace Components

124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of WAAM for steel construction – Manufacturing, material and geometric properties, design, and future directions

94Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fuchs, C., Baier, D., Semm, T., & Zaeh, M. F. (2020). Determining the machining allowance for WAAM parts. Production Engineering, 14(5–6), 629–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-020-00982-9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

65%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

16%

Researcher 4

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 26

84%

Materials Science 4

13%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free