Epidemiology of Injuries Sustained by Civilians and Local Combatants in Contemporary Armed Conflict: An Appeal for a Shared Trauma Registry Among Humanitarian Actors

37Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Conflict-related injuries sustained by civilians and local combatants are poorly described, unlike injuries sustained by US, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and coalition military personnel. An understanding of injury epidemiology in twenty-first century armed conflict is required to plan humanitarian trauma systems capable of responding to population needs. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of databases (e.g., PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, World Health Organization Catalog, Google Scholar) and grey literature repositories to identify records that described conflict-related injuries sustained by civilians and local combatants since 2001. Results: The search returned 3501 records. 49 reports representing conflicts in 18 countries were included in the analysis and described injuries of 58,578 patients. 79.3% of patients were male, and 34.7% were under age 18 years. Blast injury was the predominant mechanism (50.2%), and extremities were the most common anatomic region of injury (33.5%). The heterogeneity and lack of reporting of data elements prevented pooled analysis and limited the generalizability of the results. For example, data elements including measures of injury severity, resource utilization (ventilator support, transfusion, surgery), and outcomes other than mortality (disability, quality of life measures) were presented by fewer than 25% of reports. Conclusions: Data describing the needs of civilians and local combatants injured during conflict are currently inadequate to inform the development of humanitarian trauma systems. To guide system-wide capacity building and quality improvement, we advocate for a humanitarian trauma registry with a minimum set of data elements.

References Powered by Scopus

Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions

37104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality

2046Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

One-sided violence against civilians in war: Insights from new fatality data

425Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multifunctional and Smart Wound Dressings—A Review on Recent Research Advancements in Skin Regenerative Medicine

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Damage-associated molecular patterns and their signaling pathways in primary blast lung injury: New research progress and future directions

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pediatric casualties in contemporary armed conflict: A systematic review to inform standardized reporting

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wild, H., Stewart, B. T., LeBoa, C., Stave, C. D., & Wren, S. M. (2020, June 1). Epidemiology of Injuries Sustained by Civilians and Local Combatants in Contemporary Armed Conflict: An Appeal for a Shared Trauma Registry Among Humanitarian Actors. World Journal of Surgery. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05428-y

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

77%

Researcher 5

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

69%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

15%

Neuroscience 2

8%

Social Sciences 2

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 34

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free