Differing perspectives on what is important in media reporting of suicide

12Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is a substantial literature which demonstrates that irresponsible reporting of suicide can lead to copycat acts and, as a result, many countries have developed guidelines for media professionals. Some of the recommendations in these guidelines draw directly on the evidence and describe how reporting can be done in a measured fashion that minimises any likely negative influence. Other recommendations relate more to good journalistic practice and are about showing respect for the bereaved in their time of grieving. The study by Chapple et al, in this issue, indicates that there may sometimes be tensions between what media guidelines recommend and what those bereaved by suicide believe is important. We would argue that in such cases common ground can be reached.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pirkis, J., & Machlin, A. (2013, September). Differing perspectives on what is important in media reporting of suicide. British Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.112.124396

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free