Characterization, Design and Optimization of Low-Profile Cavities for UWB Spiral Antennas

  • Rahman N
  • Sharma A
  • N. Afsar M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we present a methodology for developing very low profile, hybrid, cavity-backed UWB spiral antennas from a precision electromagnetic material characterization standpoint. Using our method, we have accurately characterized, designed and optimized the dimensions of a 2-18GHz, cavity-backed Archimedean spiral antenna. The simulation and measurement results show that the antenna demonstrates excellent axial ratio and gain-bandwidth performance while maintaining an absorptive cavity depth of only 0.625 inches. The procedure can be extended to the design and optimization of any low-profile spiral radiator required to operate over extremely broad frequencies.

Figures

  • Figure 1. 2-arm, Archimedean spiral antenna with a shallow cavity
  • Figure 4. Measured constitutive parameters for the third metal-backed layer (WT-BPJA-010)
  • Figure 2. Measured constitutive parameters for the first layer (AN-74)
  • Figure 5. Reflection coefficient of BPJA010 as a function of frequency. It is a narrowband absorber and exhibits strong absorption at 5GHz at 0.18” thickness
  • Table 1. Comparison of gain and axial ratio (dB) performance of optimized antennas with purely dielectric absorbers and hybrid absorbing materials in cavity
  • Figure 6. Measured vs. simulated gain (dBi) for principal planes at 2GHz
  • Figure 10. Measured vs. simulated gain (dBi) for principal planes at 18 GHz
  • Figure 12. Return loss S11 (dB) vs. frequency (GHz)

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rahman, N., Sharma, A., & N. Afsar, M. (2012). Characterization, Design and Optimization of Low-Profile Cavities for UWB Spiral Antennas. International Journal of Electromagnetics and Applications, 2(3), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijea.20120203.01

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘16‘17‘18‘2102468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 5

56%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 7

78%

Computer Science 1

11%

Materials Science 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0