Prediction of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty outcome: Anatomy-based staging system versus severity-based staging system

93Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Study Objective: To evaluate and compare outcomes of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) for obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) using anatomy- and severity-based staging systems. Design: Prospective design with a retrospective review. Setting: A tertiary-care, sleep disorder referral center. Patients: In total, 110 patients with OSAHS (105 men, 5 women; mean age, 43 years; apnea-hypopnea index, 44.4 ± 28.8 events per hour; body mass index, 27.1 ± 3.3 kg/m2). Measurements: An anatomy-based staging system (stages I-IV) was used to classify patients with OSAHS by examining tongue-palate position, tonsil size, body mass index, and craniofacial deformities. Patients were also classified as having mild, moderate, moderate-severe, or severe OSAHS based on preoperative apnea-hypopnea index from polysomnography (a severity-based staging system). Surgical success was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index and a postoperative apnea-hypopnea index of less than 20 events per hour. Intervention: UPPP was performed in all patients. Results: The overall success rate of UPPP was 78%. Success rates for mild (90%), moderate (73%), moderate-severe (81%), and severe (74%) diseases were similar (p = .10). Conversely, success rates for patients with anatomy-based stages I, II, III, and IV were 100%, 96%, 65%, and 20%, respectively; these rates were significantly different (p < .001). Changes in apnea-hypopnea index were significantly correlated with Friedman tongue position (FTP)(r = -0.33, p = .0004) and tonsil size (r = -0.37, p < .0001). The FTP (odds ratio = 0.43, SE = 0.13, p = .005, 95% confidence interval = 0.24-0.78) and tonsil size (odds ratio = 3.13, SE = 1.53, p = .02, 95% confidence interval = 1.20-8.17), but not the severity-based staging (odds ratio = 0.77, SE=0.18, p = .283, 95% confidence interval = 0.49-1.23), were predictive of surgical success. Conclusion: The anatomy-based staging system predicted UPPP outcomes more effectively than did the severity-based staging. The anatomy-based staging system facilitates good case-selection information for counseling patients before UPPP surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, H. Y., Wang, P. C., Lee, L. A., Chen, N. H., & Fang, T. J. (2006, December 1). Prediction of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty outcome: Anatomy-based staging system versus severity-based staging system. Sleep. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/29.12.1537

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free