Pathological or physiological erosion - Is there a relationship to age?

71Citations
Citations of this article
136Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This conventional literature review discusses whether pathological tooth wear is age dependant. It briefly reviews the components of tooth wear and the prevalence of tooth wear in children, adolescents and adults. The emphasis on terminology relating to tooth wear varies. In some countries, the role of erosion is considered the most important, whereas others consider the process to be a combination of erosion, attrition and abrasion often with one being more dominant. The importance of tooth wear or erosion indices in the assessment and the evidence for progression within subject and within lesions is described. The data from the few studies reporting pathological levels of wear reported in children and adults are discussed, in particular its relationship with age. There is little evidence to support the concept that pathological levels of erosion or wear are age dependant. There is, however, some evidence to suggest that normal levels of erosion or wear are age dependant. © Springer-Verlag 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bartlett, D., & Dugmore, C. (2008). Pathological or physiological erosion - Is there a relationship to age? Clinical Oral Investigations, 12(SUPPL.1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0177-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free